Kim Bergstr?m
2005-02-23 17:25:20 UTC
Hi,
I'm having problems with receiving IDocs from an SAP system using the
BizTalk Adapter v2.0 for mySAP Business Suite. I've set up a receive
port and location and when we test the RFC destination in SAP the
connection to BizTalk works. However, when an IDoc is sent it fails
with the error "RfcAbort: Cannot lock transaction".
I'm using Microsoft BizTalk Server 2004 (v. 3.0.4902.0), the SAP .NET
Connector Runtime (v. 1.2.1) and Microsoft BizTalk Adapter v2.0 for
MySAP Business Suite (v. 2.0.0313.0) in this test environment. I've
also installed hotfix 884553 (see below).
I initially had problems in my development environment where I got an
error message in SAP saying "TARGET_METHOD_EXCEPTION raised by
external server". I found a hotfix (884553), which solved this so
everything works fine there. But in the development environment I'm
using the SAP .NET Connector v2.0. That is the only difference as far
as I can see.
Don't really know where to start error tracking so any help would be
appreciated!
Thanks,
Kim
I'm having problems with receiving IDocs from an SAP system using the
BizTalk Adapter v2.0 for mySAP Business Suite. I've set up a receive
port and location and when we test the RFC destination in SAP the
connection to BizTalk works. However, when an IDoc is sent it fails
with the error "RfcAbort: Cannot lock transaction".
I'm using Microsoft BizTalk Server 2004 (v. 3.0.4902.0), the SAP .NET
Connector Runtime (v. 1.2.1) and Microsoft BizTalk Adapter v2.0 for
MySAP Business Suite (v. 2.0.0313.0) in this test environment. I've
also installed hotfix 884553 (see below).
I initially had problems in my development environment where I got an
error message in SAP saying "TARGET_METHOD_EXCEPTION raised by
external server". I found a hotfix (884553), which solved this so
everything works fine there. But in the development environment I'm
using the SAP .NET Connector v2.0. That is the only difference as far
as I can see.
Don't really know where to start error tracking so any help would be
appreciated!
Thanks,
Kim